I woke with a dream this morning. I dreamed that a young girl told me she’d had a dream about the “Lord of the Rings” film and could I explain her dream to her. 

The response as I dreamed it was that I mentioned the character Gollum or his real name Sméagol, who is actually a hobbit. He’s the character who Bilbo Baggins originally gets the rings from. He is hiding in a dark cave caught up with protecting his “Precious”, which is really the “One ring that has power over all the others”. In other words he is protecting the one thing that needs no protection at all because it is the most powerful of all possessions. It was however forged by the Dark Lord Sauron and had the property of making the wearer invisible and taking them into the shadow worlds.

Bilbo-RingI explain to her that this is who we’ve become. That we are trying to hide our own power because we are frightened somebody will steal it, rather than using the very same power to shine our spiritual light onto the world. The result is that we have become deformed bipolar characters living in a very dark cave in the shadows without any connections to the external light world. It is the innocent Bilbo who discovers the nature of this power when he becomes invisible when he puts it on his finger.

He also notices that he instantly becomes paranoid that someone will steal it like the previous owner. He has discovered that power can be used but it has to be respected otherwise it corrupts. The quotation ascribed to Lord Acton is well-known “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men.”

This is why Bilbo takes to wearing the ring on a chain around his neck hidden from those who want to use the power for their own aggrandisement, and uses it only in dire circumstances.

Ring of powerSo what has this got to do with us, and specifically me? I have been working on creating a 28-Day Life Challenge programme and I woke up realising that the challenge most people have (and I include myself here) is that we are fearful of our own power. We would sooner turn it over in the secret cave of our own minds, where we tell ourselves how special we are, how powerful we would be so the world had better watch out. Our secret Ring of Power is our own preciousness.

What I discovered is that unless we accept that we have so much power, but we have to tap into it. This is not the unlimited power that corrupts, but it is personal power that we need to keep on a chain close to our chests and use it sparingly in the right conditions. We know we have that power, we are not confused or frightened by it, but we don’t need to display it as a means of frightening others either. We are not aggressive, nor are we defensive or disinterested, we are engaged in the challenge for awareness.

It is as a part of the eternal contract that these messages hidden in works of fiction become known to those who will carry us forward in the New Epoch.  If anyone is interested I will be asking for volunteers to trial, test and improve the 28-Day Challenge soon. You can contact me or keep your eyes open for its release.

 

BooksFollowing on from my previous posting. For many years friends and clients have commented that I must have read a lot of books, which actually is not true mainly because I am not a fast reader. However, over the years I have been guided to read significant books for my personal unfolding. As it turns out everything integrates together once you have the vision to see that.

For years I have followed the Toltec path waiting to be pushed or pulled towards a teacher all the while resisting Mercredan and how he defined himself as an empty window into the Unknown. After the intenseness of the Tour and my own awakening to the Force I realised that my access wasn’t so much to Mercredan as it was through Mercredan to what is termed the Nagual. The Nagual is more like a position from which to perceive the manifest forms of reality, which in Toltec terms are known as the Tonal.

Inner-LandscapeIt is said that a Seer is one who can penetrate the mystery of perception and register the three distinct fields of awareness; the known, the unknown and the unknowable. The gift of perception is to tranform that which is unknown into the known world; to bring the Nagual to rearrange the landscape of the Tonal. This is such an important concept because our world is exactly as it appears to be because of the arrangement of our perceptions.

Everything that happens in life features in the Tonal landscape, in themselves none of the events are good or bad, only they are out of harmony with the rest of the creation. The organisation and arrangement of the features are the purpose for the experience, and in the end for one’s life at all.

As a result of this insight I have decided to open a sacred school for initiation based on a Toltec party. The school has a clear structure, plan, purpose and method. I do not see myself so much as Nagual but my connection as Mercredan. Students to this new enterprise will have regular access to Mercredan. Initially I will accept only two apprentices. The entrance criteria are based on Intention, Willingness and Commitment. Contact me for details.

 

Francis - grant3 500The Mercredan Tour finished and I have arrived back home with a totally new perspective. It often happens when you start something with a set of ideas and after the event(s) you have to review or debrief what the result was. For me this has been a complete re-evaluation of who I am, and what is this Mercredan experience.

First I might explain that I (Mercredan) sat before a wide range of audiences and individuals. I rarely remember any part of the delivery but as I reorient myself back into the environment I do experience the “feel” of the room and those within it. In a more palpable way than I ever have before I realised the energy fingerprint was very different in each, and relative to those specific people.

Boundary membraneI also had another realisation which was distinct from but surely connected to the Mercredan phenomena. This is that I (or it might be Delaine and I) have a marked effect on people we touch. While this effect might be disturbing it certainly is healthy, creative and productive. On this journey we seem to have opened many people to their potential and can only hope that they take the actions required to shift forward.

This understanding lead me to realise what I already knew but in a more exciting fashion. Mercredan had said for a long time that “He” was more like a position lying at the boundary between the known and the unknown areas of consciousness. He, then, is an Unknown quantity, and as the tour progressed I found myself realising that I was also an Unknown quantity. I realised that fame, or being recognised certainly increases ones ticket sales, but also creates a public persona that has to be maintained. This answers why so many of the greatest teachers maintain an air of secrecy.

I arrived back with a knowledge of my gift, and why it is so rare. I am an Unknown, and even if I choose to share my entire history without censorship I will remain Unknown because I know I can only connect to Mercredan by releasing my self-importance. Only an Unknown can connect to the Unknown.

path-to-infinitySo what is this Unknown I am talking about? Merc explained that the Divine, All That Is, is without description, without measure and is totally Unknowable. Then He explains that the Known is that small part of consciousness that has been explored, described, determined and categorised. Between the Unknowable and the Known lies that part of consciousness that contains all potential available to be explored. This is the, as yet, Unknown.

So those of you who were touched by Mercredan were also touched by the Unknown. And the Unknown is in a constant interaction with the Unknowable, the Divine, because as the Unknown becomes Known the Unknowable becomes potential. An Unknown becomes Known when knowledge is put into action and the experiential result is stored in the Collective unconscious.

I, on the other hand, am constantly touched by the Unknown, and the result of this is that my mind is empty most of the time. I wait only for knowledge to arrive, this as a result of the many years of allowing Mercredan to access it. A further result of this is that I am open to the essential calls from those who come to see me, and I am able to connect them to their higher truths.

fingerprintI know this is common claim, yet I don’t do this without external evidence. I interpret events that occur around people on a seemingly random incidence. I claim that everyone creates events, circumstances and objects in their world as pointers and guidance. Mostly everyone overlooks these as far too obvious, or unimportant. The occult is only hidden because it is in plain sight. I do not create the events or objects for people, but I do draw their attention to them, and point to how these describe the next evolutionary steps.

So the Mercredan Tour showed me in its own powerful way, that I am a Key to the Unknown. A most unimportant teacher and way-shower. As something I knew but didn’t know why – I am a Seer in the most accurate use of the word. An Unknown Seer at that.

tapestryM: Good afternoon. Once again, it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. I want to begin to put another string around what we have discussed, because so often it looks as if reality is one way, and yet words do not quite describe how everything fits together. We talked as if there are layers of vibration; that there is a hierarchy of planes of existence that somehow fall down from one degree to the next. And yet that is hardly how it occurs at all. One might say that there are finer and finer fabrics. That there are coarsely woven ones, much like your canvas, and finer ones like your linen, and finer again as if it is like cottons, and finer again as if it is like silk. Do you understand the analogy here?

S: I do.

M: And each one interfaces with the next, so the finest fabric impinges upon every level, and the coarser it gets, the less impressions it causes, and so on, into the physical materialized forms.

S: The “physical materialized forms” being the coarsest of all?

M: Of course. The solid structure where atoms and molecules begin to stick together to form what seems to be a solid system. So while it appears in that regard, of course, it is only perceived in that way through the physical senses. As soon as one shifts beyond the physical nature, one discovers new realms. No one has yet managed to measure an emotion, yet emotions are quite obvious to everybody. No one has yet managed to capture a thought, even in its most solid forms in terms of vibrations and electro-chemicals. Of course, the most subtle the equipment, the greater one begins to understand such things exist. But what information do they carry? So you can measure where something has been. You can measure the carrier, but not what it is carrying. That opens up a grand conversation.

S: You were speaking with our dear friend in Australia asking her to picture spirals within a spiral; were you saying something similar about the coarseness of the fabric?

Spiral FractalM: Of course, the point of the cyclic nature of reality, everything is evolving; yet seemingly it is always in return, as if all the cycles of experience, even if one is not progressing very much, the events of the past that are not completed certainly reappear in one’s life. Not exactly the same, of course. And the degree of progression, the amount of movement forward, is the spiral within the spiral within the spiral of time and space as it is. And also the implications of how that interacts with the natures of those with whom you share the composite.

S: I’m not sure what you mean by that.

M: Let us refer back to our analogy of the writer’s cooperative. Then you are sitting within your group exploring and explaining and sharing one’s latest chapters. So as it is, as one person talks about their creation, it impinges on those who are listening. So they often take on what is said, and new insights appear. Not just in that direction. You understand how often it is when somebody is truly listening to you, that you suddenly have new thoughts about what you are speaking about. As if the very listening gives a different perspective, as if you can both speak and hear one’s own versions. The implication, then, is the degree that one is present. So if you are in a particular situation, where you are being for the very first time truly heard, then the person listening has to be entirely present. And in being present, you start to fall in yourself into the feeling that you are truly present. So that is the point of presence. And how powerful it is, as it brings new insights, new leverage to your life.

S: Okay. That’s wonderful. I’m having the sense, when I hear you speak of the author’s group, I envision this team of Francis and Annabelle and Susan somehow working together to experiment with sound and music to write a symphony.

M: That is the point! Not just to exclude others, because others will begin to join. The greater the degree of unity, the greater the magnetic force. That is why people who dedicate to a cause bring in those that are ready to belong, that have an extra gift to bring. This is not exclusion, because there is nothing stopping anybody from tapping into the universal system (position?). And one might simply say that the new sequence, the new epoch, arrived only because enough people began to recognize an inner unity, an inner voice, and truly the voice of the silence. I use that term because over many years, in fact centuries of time, this universal naming is best recognizing the truth. Then the voice of the silence is the voice that you give to the silence, that we give to the silence, to the endless potentials that are possible. As this opens up the doorways to higher thoughts and spiritual evolution, it also opens the door to the other extremes. So the epoch, as it opens up, separates those who wished to accumulate, and those that wish to evolve. So it is, then, that it is time, as the beginning of the epoch brings together what are magnetic nodes that accumulate energy towards a different life purpose.

S: So even though when it seems like things in the old world still seem to be as strong as they ever were, and gaining more speed and becoming more destructive [thinking at the moment of the most recent mass racial shootings in South Carolina], what you’re saying is that there’s hope, or the promise, that it’s equally as strong, and in fact even stronger on the other side.

M: That is the truth. Even in your present moment, the very nature of the destruction and devastation of old thinking begins to impact on your society as a whole. Then even the very nature of disparity when one race is against another, even that is beginning to realize that it is destructive. The old patterns, the old ideas are often brought to a head by those that wish to bring it to its knees. Destruction often causes its paradoxical opposite! And that is a most important lesson.

Pope FrancisS: Is there anything significant about the timing of the Pope’s release of his letter to the world on climate change and the extreme danger our mother earth is in as it fits in with this change in our epoch?

M: Even the very foundation of your fundamental church has changed. So you understand there is a true saint among you. Often they are not recognized, but this one truly is the saint of the people, because he is no longer willing to put the church’s benefit before the people that it serves. So this one brings the church back to its roots. This one is a saint because he is in touch with the foundational God that founded it.

S: Okay. That’s what I thought. And the response that we’ve heard by what I consider the old paradigm, particularly the wealthy United States Republicans in Congress who claim that it’s all hogwash, and the Pope should stick to morality… It’s just a greater separation of the two?

M: Because the saint has reduced the accumulation of wealth in such a form as one of the evil forces! So this saint understands that his life is at risk. It has always been at risk. And yet he continues on with the sense that no matter what, the sacrifice of his life will indeed bring the church to its principles, finally, and in doing so will restructure so many nations on the planet.

S: Great!

M: He has put his life on the line and sacrifice, because as a saint, that is what they do. So over many years the church has called many as saints, yet few have truly sacrificed their life for the truth, whatever [they think] that is.

S: I understand. And the thing that’s so wonderful, it seems to me, is his impact is having a wider sphere of influence than “just the catholics” whom he’s supposed to represent.

Pope-IslamM: Because this saint represents the church as a whole! This saint even goes beyond the walls of your own faith into the realms of the others, because what is truth will find support with all who believe in the truth. So there is no need for walls against different religions, only against fundamental ideology that pits one group against another.

S: Exactly! The whole separation thing just seems to be the undoing.

M: Of course. Because all things are unity. Every great speaker has pointed that out, whether that is religious, philosophical, psychological, and scientific. There is no dispute that all things arise from unity and what we have called the ever-expanding singularity returning to feast upon itself.

S: Wow.

M: And so it is irrelevant how one lives and dies, but the sacrifice of one’s life for truth, in the end, is the progression that everybody is looking forward to. So you hold onto the material plane. Of course, in doing so you are caught up in the physical and material plane, and in doing so it impedes your own development. That is the message of all religions over all time. And even whole groups that are caught up must eventually meet the truth. Destiny, of course, is what you meet. And in doing so, the very nature of one’s life in the end has to be counted.

S: I understand. In several sessions, you’ve told me a lot about my own balancing and rebalancing over many lifetimes between the masculine and the feminine, and that I am here on Kauai now for a time of completion, of settling down, of integration…

Alchemical Wedding by Emily BalivetM: That is the point, isn’t it? To really bring together all the ideas and the separation that it causes. So often, in human material for embodiment, one considers what one’s gender is as separate from the opposite. One then tries to express the nature of the opposite, as if it is indeed your own, as if you can somehow integrate yourself within your own gender, and exclude the opposite gender. Rather than being quite contented with one’s own gender, and integrating the opposite by value, by seeing the opposite as part of the whole completion. That one finds one’s unity by acceptance of the opposite, and feeling its resonance inside yourself. Very different from trying to emulate the opposite. Does that make sense?

S: Yes, it does. It does.

M: So when you are close to the opposite, you begin to perceive the different energy that it emanates, and in doing so feel its beauty, not with envy, not with hatred, not with resistance or exclusion, but by valuing it for what it is. And that is why it is important that one does not remove oneself from the environment, from the community.

S: I understand. I’ve been invited, in fact kind of forced, to go to a dinner in a couple of nights that I normally would not have gone to. And just the fact that I’m going and that I’m allowing myself to be open to whatever materializes that night…

M: Let us say this. If you are going to go, go and have some fun! What do you fear you will lose? What will happen that is going to take anything from you? And then think, “What can I take with me that will enhance everybody in this group?” Then you take your enthusiasm; and it is not that everybody has to accept it, but it is a test of whether you can sense your enthusiasm, even if others do not like it. Do you understand what I mean? It is like being enthusiastic even in the face of it all. That is what your pope is doing! This is how a saint operates. This is how one elevates one’s nature. Positive, enthusiastic, light-hearted and funny in the face of everything!

S: Okay; that’s great.

M: So I am going to suggest, get dressed up, be as flamboyant as you can! Be the person you want to be, that you are inside, without the reservation, that is the reserve in case something untoward happens and you can wrap yourself in your cloaks of fears. The cloak of protection is simply a cloak of fear.

S: You’ve said that before, and I know that you’re not going to tell me, quote, the answer, but I sure can’t figure out what the fear is. I’m going to keep being receptive…

M: Then watch yourself at your dinner! Watch when you hold yourself in reserve. Then you will be able to see what it is that holds you in check. And if you understand what happens sometimes is, you feel it coming, and then you go beyond. That is a signal one has stepped beyond the boundaries. One is then living in the light of the day.

S: Hmmm.

M: That is what that statement refers to.
“Living in the light” is truly living as one wants to be remembered.

S: Okay! That’s great. That will help, just on a practical level, because I can’t figure it out, I can’t think it to death!

M: Of course, when one is safe, that is in one’s own environment with one’s own possessions around you and one’s own friends and so on, that is not an unsafe place, so where will the fears arise? Only when one is out of one’s usual environment.

S: Okay. Well, I guess whatever fear is there, I sure need to figure it out.

M: Let us promote that the old patterns are truly dismissed.

S: All right! That’s good. [long pause]

M: So where will our conversation take us next?

S: I would like to know a lot more about how to be in silence and be in touch with that small, still voice within, that’s my truth. How do I hear that more?

M: Let us say this. [very long pause] Most often, the answers to questions lie in the law of paradox and polarity. So let us take this as a practical example. One wants to get in touch on the inside, so one begins by getting in touch with the outside. So this is why we have said, look at the universe that you live in. Look at the trees and the plants, one at a time. Be in touch with them. Throw out your self, and listen to their voice. Listen to what this tree is proclaiming, not what you think in terms of what it wants or anything else, but what it IS.

Then you begin to identify with it, and realize this tree is a special being. It is an expression of the nature of what we can call “treedom.” The whole nature of the rest of creation is mostly built up in terms of a unified field, rather than individuality. So when one touches the very nature of treedom, what you discover is it is made up of a universe of identities— of fibres and sugars and boundary layers and activity and movement and systems and structures and fibres — and all of it wrapped in its boundary layer of the bark that carries it down deep into the ground.

And when you identify, you can feel your roots deep in. You are no longer worrying about self, but you are identified with its leaves and its branch (?) and its identity over time, its willingness to be buffeted, to fulfill its purpose. Do you understand, its solid nature and its lack of consideration of whether it will live for a thousand years or not. It doesn’t have those, and in doing so, by identifying with your world, you begin to put aside the process of figuring out everything. Does that make sense?

S: It does.

M: Because you are not who you think you are. You are your entire universe, and until you… My dear friend sent you an image of a singularity expanding to its universe and returning to its source. And so it is, until you can truly gather the sensitivity of your universe, how can you carry it back to the source? How can the next wave proceed forward? This picture is so important, because it is in the consciousness of the singularity. It is what you send out into the universe, whether it is conscious or it is conditioned. Whether you are authentic, or whether you are living through your layers upon layers upon layers of ideas and ideologies. And that is the point, how beliefs infiltrate and cause the reality to express itself.

S: I understand. It’s very frustrating because it feels like you’re underwater in a pool and swimming to the surface to try to get through all of those layers, but you just can’t ever break the surface of the water.

M: If you begin to be enjoying the swim, if you are enjoying the water, and time ceases, then there is nothing to break through! And suddenly you become the entire pond. Then you are the surface and the swimmer and the pond and the fish in it as well, and everything, even the container that it is in. Do you understand what I mean?

S: I hear what you’re saying there, but that seems to conflict with the idea that we have all of these layers of untruths and conditioning and ideas that we have been taught, or that we’ve created, that are messing it all up, and not letting us get through, and yet you’re saying…

M: You can try to eliminate the old ideas, or you can focus in on the truth. The old ideas are only there because you keep feeding them with your energy. The singularity keeps putting out the conditioning because you have not found the singularity — the unity of the smallest and the greatest.

S: Okay.

M: Even science in its highest form is beginning to understand this principle. And so it is when you are at the centre, when you are at the source of it, then you are also at the edge, the boundary layer that separates the known from the unknown. It is at that point that knowledge of what you want comes in to be.

S: Okay. Wow. That’s wonderful, Mercredan, thank you so much. I’m sort of picturing myself now as a bubble in the water — not struggling against it or trying to swim, but at least understanding the concept of becoming one with it.

M: Of course. And then one is not causing a path that has an end point that you are trying to arrive at. You will never be separate from! Often the church wanted everyone to think that what is called “the Christ” was a person! But the Christ is a particular location in which is truly the singularity, the beginning of the expression. That is why, in reality, the cross that it represents is three-dimensional, not the two-dimensional that you constantly manufacture. It simply says that there is one arm longer than the other. That is, the physical has a bigger distance to get to the source before it expresses itself in all directions, in all spaces. And the idea that you are separate, that there is a goal, is not true. Because one has always been attached to that point. There is no separation from the unity excepting the barriers of beliefs that you put in your way to it.

S: Why do we make it so difficult for ourselves?

M: Hmm. Every being has, in the descent into matter over many lifetimes, created lessons that they wish to [pause] solve. Not simply for self, but for the whole. So then you make up these tests that you put yourself through.

S: Okay. That makes sense.

M: One should not consider a test the end point. It isn’t a pass or a fail as such, but whether one has gained the benefits.

S: Right. Because the process never ends.

M: Of course. Even as one begins to finally integrate it all, the lessons never end.

S: That’s amazing. Okay.

M: Is that enough for today?

 

Much of this session was personal information, so it has been abridged to give the useful comments that Mercredan made.

Overlayed Impressions

M: Good morning. Once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. (Voice speaking so very gently) The first comment is how everything in life is significant. The reality of the creation is impression upon impression upon impression. And the emerging reality is the composite of all of such impressions. So when it is important as a message, one’s evidence for life, one’s evidence of one’s awakening as such, is the degree of compassion one can entertain.

More than anything, the very entertaining of compassion frees so much hurt from the past efforts of the soul. So you understand what I mean. Even if it is unconnected, the expression of compassion clears away significant amounts of the emotional astral baggage that a person carries along.

(A: This reminds me of the outpouring of compassion on Princess Diana’s death and how the depression cases, suicide and divorce rates plummeted immediately afterwards in the UK.)

M: Often when such things occur, One does not truly understand the depth of the impressions that are released in that fashion. Do you understand what I mean?

A: I do understand, and it felt deep. I could not find the thoughts or the words to match what it was [I was feeling].

M: I want to perhaps describe this a little more in detail. Shall we suggest for example that one holds one’s identity by manufacturing many impressions of who you are. Many ideas of one’s degree of value and the degree of isolation one often impresses as well. Such like the modelling of your clay as we have spoken. One impresses a little figure upon it, and then one impresses a slightly different impression, and on it goes until the resulting finished item doesn’t resemble any of the individual impressions. Does that make sense?

A: (laughs) yes.

M: You think you are highly talented. One impression. And then you think that you are not acceptable. Another impression. And then you think that you are a good mother. Another impression. And then you think you are not a good mother. Another impression, and on it goes until you have the finished …

A: (laughs) …mess.

M: …idea. You understand, and then you begin to create impressions on the world out of that identity. So you think, “Mm, I can be a world class presenter,” and then, as you begin, the impression of “You’re not a good Mother” “You are too idealistic” and “You haven’t got your best make-up” and on it goes again. That is how creation truly operates. So even the most important breakdown, even if it is a crisis, it shatters most often the form of who you thought you were.

And to rebuild that overall pattern, the overall form, allows one to forget impressions that are no longer as valid as they used to be. Do you follow what I mean?

A: Yes.

DogStick1M: So one wants to have the impression that one is a “strong” person and then one realises that strength does not protect you against feelings at all. And then you begin to acknowledge that one’s vulnerability is a part of yourself that you quite realise as important and as valid expression. And so the softer nature begins to take more precedence.

The impression is somewhat more pronounced, shall we say — higher up in the layers that are creating the Universe. Does that follow along the way? Because we are talking truly in dimensions of reality. The physical nature, the solidness of form maintained over a sequence of time, creates the thought and the solid reality of movement, and then overlaid by the impressional world that creates a different sensation. Do you understand how that is?

A: Mm…

M: So these are important fields of endeavour because one overlays historical events in terms of the interpretation that one impresses on oneself, on others and on your universe.

A: [So, I’ve witnessed] this crisis point. Rather than me pointing to why I think this crisis has happened and what’s come from it, am I better to just not focus on that at all and just start with a blank canvas on myself? I don’t know what’s happening for the others…

M: Of course. One begins by putting the value on one’s compassion and the fact that compassion is a quality that is certainly aligned in the field of love. Love then allows somebody to emerge from what used to be their old impressions. Someone who has always impressed upon themselves that they are not affected by others discover there are indeed those who can affect them in such significant ways that they are no longer the same person. And how does it mean when others try to force you back into an outdated, outmoded idea?

A: Mm. It goes against the grain.

M: You understand. Then you have to change everybody else’s impression as well as one’s own. Compassion allows that person [to know] that they have a compatriot holding a new vision, a new way of life. Not that they have to change to meet that person but that they can remodel themselves.

A: It’s such a great gift, isn’t it.

M: It is. A magnificent gift because, in the process of helping others, one’s evolution is granted a great leap.

A: Mm mm.

M: When you can see someone trying their best to evolve, what greater gift is there than to be alongside their own evolution holding and supporting and giving them the necessary energy? Because the evolution of another is one’s own evolution.

A: Mm beautiful.

M: You understand, because there is no separation whatsoever in all reality.

[…………………….]

M: One often perceives the newborn as if they are immediately embodied, but a soul does not usually take up residence at any [consistent] time. First of all, it would like to check out the “gravity” of the situation. It would like to check out the structure of the body and the environment in which it has come to Be. Often times there are those souls that simply touch and come into the environment as part of a greater drama than you think.

Baby in wombM: First of all, parents have to share a part of their own Being in order to manufacture the initial physical body. So in some sense your scientific viewpoint of the physical structure and manufacture of a physical body is indeed accurate to a certain degree. There are also different fields involved as well as the simple physical. It is with that engagement that the spiritual body, the soul infusion, takes up residence. Only when it is born is it completely free of its initial impression. That is, its physical embodied structure. Then it begins to take up residence. Begins to re-decorate.

[Mercredan seems to be saying that a baby is born with impressions made by its parents and after the birth starts to impress itself with its own conclusions]

[…………………..]

A: Does the Universe help [someone] gain insight or do they figure it out themselves? Or is there opportunity for them to just not notice and continue on with the old impressions?

M: Let us say, crisis almost always redefines a person’s impressions of themselves. Whether that is for the better or for a lesser…

A: Ugh! Accumulating more baggage.

M: Of course. So that is why sometimes, after [a significant] event, partnerships are less cohesive and in the end separate or become more cohesive, more thoughtful of one another, rebinding, re-energising and beginning to truly share a unit as such. Such a unit then, identifies itself often at a greater impressional than the individuals that make it up.

A: Ah! The sum is greater than the two parts.

M: And importantly, when the physical body of a new generation comes out of that structure, it will be quite harmonious and often very beautiful. Some children, some babies are more beautiful than others simply because they have [been] nurtured and matured in an envelope that is impressed with love.

A: Yes, I know of one of those right now I am thinking of. 

M: [A] baby, then, [which] has a certain element and such, in the present then, are [from] the new species.

A: Yes, indeed. Well that’s what I was wondering. Out of all the new ones that are coming about, there are those that are the beautiful ones, of which I see a lot more of now, and then there are some that have come out of disharmony. Will they just not last? Will they all choose to disembody?

M: Not entirely. It depends on the nature of the problem and the nature of the soul and its purpose in taking over the body. In [another] recent discussion we [made] comment and reference to those people that are often seen as what you call “intellectually handicapped”.

Impression of selfThe point of it is, the intellectual field, the overlay of intellect, is being put to one side in order to truly experience the nature of feeling — especially the ability to love. So somebody who wants to really explore love and acceptance can choose to come in with a repressed intellect. In doing so they can experience both the concept of lack of acceptance and their ability to love through it. Indeed, in such a life, [they] often take a great spiritual leap forward. They are learning something that so often the intellect uses to create impressions on the identity.

A: Yes, yes, that makes perfect sense, and the idea that we only give love providing we get something back in return. It’s a totally different experience from that.

M: Exactly. So these ones often come in the next lifetime as great leaders, great spiritual guides.

A: I see.

M: So they have no need for huge intellects or huge personalities and ego because they have been through that system. It is important to recognise that and to realise that one might even be in the presence of a great soul. Because often they are, at a different level, quite amused by the lack of acceptance, by the reality that others around them find them quite difficult. So it is quite a humour. Not always, of course, because there are those who find it quite difficult to be so excluded.

A: Yes. So does that include the Autistic children that are coming in at the moment too?

M: Some of those ones are more advanced and often are seeing more fields, more dimensions…

A: Multi-dimensions, yes.

M:… than the rest of humanity. So it is a very confusing way of Being until they begin to make sense of the patterns. These people are mostly oriented toward patterns, whether they are rhythms or whether they are visual components.

A: OK. (pause)

Impressions

M: As you can see from our conversation so far, there is a lot to be made and to understand from the concept of such impressions. Everything that you see about yourself is only the accumulation of all the varying impressions of self.

A: Yes, I feel there have been big changes there [for me], even just over the last couple of weeks.

M: So when you begin to experience a single impression and you begin to acknowledge first of all, its purpose, because you do not apply impressions for no purpose. Some people take on the impression of anger and the purpose of such anger and such displays of anger is to defend oneself against being attacked.

[………………]

M: You understand. Even that comes in with soul memory. That is, when one begins to embody with the resonances of significant… periods of time… You understand, difficult to talk [about] because all things occur at the same time.

A: I understand. So we can’t call them “past” lives. They’re just other scenarios. Just other chapters in the book.

M: That is correct. And such impressions then come in in order to make sense and to take protective steps. 

A: Mm. So are there resonances between me and [other people] that have come from other “chapters” in our books?

M: (pause) [That] depends upon the degrees of separation [to be] close enough for it to have a significant importance.

[………………….]

Of course any person that does not change their behaviours from experience is doomed to repeat over and over again. So there is that, of course.

[………………………..]

M: So Karma is not just some life memory. It affects the way one operates in the physical environment; and how one operates affects the results and the repercussions.

Forgiveness

M: You understand, one has the idea that one can forgive another but you can only forgive yourself for [whatever] things that you [did].

A: Yes, indeed. I see.

M: You understand?

A: Yes.

M: Because if you do that and you promise that you will cease, that you will desist from it in all other times, with all other beings and in all other lifetimes; that one has learned that it is not of any use.

A: And if I do that now, then, the lifetimes,  do they change?

M: Of course.

A: Right.

Parallel Universe Options

M: Because when one truly accepts that one’s word, in various lifetimes, alternatives exist alongside. Every alternative is a one that is not being focussed upon. […..] Forgiveness in your lifetime now will not be enough but, forgiveness in that lifetime because you have forgiven yourself for what you [did]. [……] Then, with almost the flick of a switch, a different [experience] can emerge right in the present.

[……………]

M: You understand it is an impression that you are putting on yourself. There are conflicting impressions. The impression, I am innocent. I am the victim of [someone else’s] personality. Of [their] behaviour. You understand?

A: Yeah but I understand what you are saying about the resonating lives where I was the one that did the…

M: You understand the impressions in the present. Then one takes them off and realises that you are creator of your own Universe…

A: Mm I know that.

M: … in total. So what is to be forgiven for?

A: No! Me! Me! Not anyone else.

M: You understand, who has created the reality? “I did of course”. So then one can forgive self for creating the situation, for creating it all. Because when one takes on the responsibility and is accountable and is transparent about it, realises and forgives self and takes the vow of honesty, then there is nothing to be carried.

A: Yes, but that is what I am saying. Can you help me find a way to forgive myself?

M: Of course. What is there to forgive? You understand what I mean?

A: No.

M: When you understand you created it all, what is there left for you to forgive? Because when you look at this particular [experience] you are still holding on to things that you think have been done to you. Do you follow?

A: Uh, ok. I must be pretending that I’m thinking otherwise. I realise that I’ve created this and that it was simply reflecting back on me my own thoughts.

M: Of course. That is the point.

A: So I don’t know what I’m holding on to then.

M: Once you are free, then the present can change.

[…………………………..]

 

Author_at_workM: Let us say because as we have pointed out, the laws, the universal laws, do indeed have to be met. That is, the Law of Polarity, that is being on the inside of one’s reality, and also being on the outside of it. Let us go back to our allegory of the author.

So the author is on the outside of the universe it is creating. However, unless you can put your imagination into the inside, you cannot really know how your character will respond or react. So you make up the storyline. Then you have to descend into the character to gain the information, the experience that was the point of writing the novel in the first place.

S: I see. I understand.

M: The point, then, is to understand the paradoxes that you are both inside and outside at the same time.

S: Okay. And is that why I’m feeling this push-pull between…

universe-boxM: Of course. Because one wants to be on the outside looking in, but you cannot be on the outside without being also on the inside. It is what you would call the binary system. You are either… You understand what I mean?

S: I think so. Why did I bring these flights of fancy into my life? [S has been visited by colourful parrots.]

M: Let us say you want some colour. You want to find your creativity again. You understand what creativity is. You understand what balance and harmony is in terms of colour and fabric, paintings and music and so on. But only from the outside. How will you manage to become one with it, learn how to create magnificence? Do you understand what I mean?

S: I think so, because you’ve just asked the question that we all want to know the answer to, which is, How do we do that?

M: First of all, one begins to play with it. In your world, often you talk about playing with the clay to create shape, to create form. It is pliable. It is able to be manipulated into varying shapes with various subtleties. And some forms have a sense of harmony and balance. You can create a form, but to create a form that is pleasing takes some effort and some perception. And because it is again significant, those that create form that is pleasing understand the nature of balance, because a form that is made of your clay has to be able to find that place. It cannot be falling over. And that is the same with your paintings. You can paint colors upon canvas, of course, but to find the shapes and forms that deliver a sensation of harmony and quietude and pleasing, requires something extra. Do you follow what I am saying?

S: I think I do because I feel like there are other people around me who can do that, and I mean literally with painting and colour, and I can’t create it myself. I recognize it when I see it, and I like it, but I can’t figure out to get there.

M: You understand, you can’t get there by thinking about it! This is exactly the same thing as being involved in your own work of art. Your reality is your work of art! And the more you begin to experiment with the colour on the canvas, the more you become skilful. The more you play with your clays, the more skilful you get at delivering pleasing sculpture. So the more you experiment with creation, the more pleasing it becomes!

S: Okay. And when you say that, are you talking about experimenting with creation on a conscious level or more just being receptive and creating…

M: The point is that they are both the same! First of all experimenting and then becoming conscious of the experimentation, not fighting it or intellectualizing. Then look at the colourful flights of fancy! Do you understand how colourful and how pleasing such is as part of your creation something that seemingly has simply descended upon you, rather than it is significant? It is even, shall we put it, a test result. The consciousness then is, how would you improve this? How does it make it even more harmonious?

S: How would I improve…

M: The creation, of course! The flights of fancy and how you interact with it. How does it become more pleasing if, indeed, you are the creator of it all?

S: Okay.

M: So you are not seeing it as something that is outside of your work of art.

S: Okay.

M: Shall we put it in a slightly different context? As one is the actor on the stage, like so many good actors, they decide to become the director as well. So you are the director of your animation, your play if you like, and everybody can be asked to practice a slightly different entrance to this scene. And it is not as if you are asking somebody to do something different, but in your imaginary world, that is when you are at the level of author, you are intending a different situation. Do you follow?

S: Kind of. I just feel like my mind is not connected with what you’re saying today. I’m thinking of things too much in the concrete, in the here and now; I’m thinking too literally.

M: That is the point. The interest gets one trapped. Because you think that the world is indeed concrete, and yet what I am saying is that appearance only comes from the point of creation, the singularity. So indeed when one intends to explore a different relationship, you would be surprised how radical a shift one might experience. If you have come to the point where you would like your flight of fancy to react in a different fashion, in the concrete world, then by putting in the intention, that is by imagining how that would play out, how it would be if it were acted out on the stage. Do you follow?

S: Yes, I do.

M: So as a director, you are standing back from the creation, from the play as it acts out, and you imagine how it could look, how it would appear, how it would please the audience if this were to be like you imagine! Great directors have that already playing in their mind. The play begins to take form and suddenly they are already a few steps ahead, knowing what nuance in the language, what sound, and sometimes even to change the dialogue. And it is simply panning in front of their mind.

First of all, you are not just the author, but you are the director as well, as well as also the producer, because you have all your capital invested in it. Not just the money, of course, but your life invested in it. And you are also the audience as well. Because when you perceive yourself in this light, then you begin to realize that there is an interaction happening between the author, the script-writer that is, and the action and the direction.

S: Okay. I’m having a hard time conceptually tying this together with the flights of fancy and the significance of why I happened to bring those into my life right now.

M: You understand, the question is to be answered first: What is the benefit of having your flights of fancy? What is the benefit, what is happening? [long pause] (He’s asking you to create! He’s not saying find the benefits that are there, but create the benefits!)

S: And I don’t know what the benefit is. I know it’s been fun to look at them. I know their owners [of the parrots] are in a very rigid, dogmatic place and that makes me feel sad…

M: And what would the breakthrough be if they were not in such a fixed position?

S: Well, the breakthrough that I would love to see is for them (and I guess “them” is a reflection of myself) to realize that it’s much, much bigger than the little box that they’re in.

M: And it’s much more fun!

S: Yes, for sure!

M: And so what occurs in your reality is you allow these people to affect your degree of fun, rather than having your fun affect their fixed position! If you are having fun, if you are colourful… Because they obviously want some colour in their life, because they have brought it onto the outside. The very spin-off of their own creation is the colourful flights of fancy that they do not have inside! Do you understand what I am saying?

S: Not quite. [I was finding it impossible to stay focused during this session.]

M: These significant birds, as you put it, their colourful plumage, their flight of fancy, their ideas, are on the outside of a rigid pattern.

S: Yes…

M: And if that interest, that colourful nature were to go onto the inside of these people, then they would indeed change their way of being.

S: I totally understand.

M: You understand what I’m talking about! And the point of what we are saying is, everything in your universe is significant, not just in your universe, but in everybody’s universe reflecting to them. The world reflects the inner from whence it emerged. So important, so helpful because what you experience on the outside is a literal description of what is on the inside.

[private discussion]

M: You have so much ideas of what is called the aging process. You are only as old as you feel! You have heard of that. However, there are some agreements that you make with other people, other realities, that you will indeed show signs of your age. That is, you have to allow them to see you with some signs. Of course as long as you have the signs, then you can have them tell you how well you are doing “for your age.”

You can be full of vitality, full of energy, full of enthusiasm, full of all of that as long as you show some signs. So the question is, choose wisely the sign you will give them so they can relax. Because if you look like you were 20 years old, they would find you quite disturbing and they would be seen as if something were not right. But one can have grace, there is nothing wrong with grace, and deportment, I think you would call it. And nothing wrong with a young mind! Nothing wrong with having lots of vitality.

S: Right. I wish I could take an energy pill!

M: And that is so human, isn’t it, to want to simply take the pill and not truly deal with the elements that make it up. But you are exploring and integrating as much as you can.

S: It seems like it’s not very much, but… [sigh]

M: You want to understand this is, while you think it is not very much, I would have to say maybe there isn’t very much that is needed!

S: Oh, that’s interesting!

M: You think that you have so much to learn to pass with your Doctor of Philosophy, there is so much because you are taught you need so much information. Yet in reality you need very little information and lots of practice!

Let us put it this way. Once you have the violin and you have learned how to hold it and how to press down on the strings and where about to press, and how to use the bow, the rest of it is practice! Over and over the same things until you have got it. And at a certain point, you realize that mostly you have it all! Then it is practising different sequences and different timings and so on. Then you can make great music.

S: Okay.

M: Less to know, more to practice.

S: And I know you’ve told us before what constitutes practice…

M: Being present! You understand, being at the center of your universe, realizing it is your living artwork. That is all it is. Your living artwork. Every new colour you put in will either make it more harmonious and more pleasing or it will be disparaging, discordant. Do you understand what I am talking about?

S: I do.

M: So in many ways, we constantly keep saying the same thing with more interesting the complexity. And more fleshing out the universal principles.

"Pinna's illusory intertwining effect" by Jochen Burghardt

“Pinna’s illusory intertwining effect” by Jochen Burghardt

S: Okay. The Law of Polarity, the Law of Paradox…

M: Of course. The cyclic laws that govern everything… Shall we say the evolutionary cycles of experience. All of these things. The Law of Magnetism. Because it is also the Law that govern the focus of energy. The Law of Magnetism will not work until you have truly realized the degree of singularity. That is being present.

S: Okay. Okay. Wow.

M: When you are present, you are not wasting energy on others. You are not wasting your energy thinking about how these others interfere with your life or disturb it or could be this way or could be that way. Being present one will simply drop in the intention, “This is how it will be!” My imaginary world I am the director. I will insist, because if not I will find another actor to take the part. Because there is a degree of definition.

S: I’m not sure I understand that. A degree of definition.

M: When one invokes an intention, you are setting in place the definition of reality. [I still don’t get it.] (Isn’t he saying that intention describes the way you describe your world. I think this really means how you see the world. We think that we see a world that exists that way, rather than seeing by altering the way we perceive reality. Is this why Mercredan wanted the Seer included as this sites title?)

M: The intention is what governs it all.

S: Okay. All right. And if we all are of the same intent, does that make our reality become more probable?

M: Of course. Then one’s realities match one another. But put it this way: You do not have to share the same reality for the experience to remain as you dictate it.

S: Oh, that’s interesting.

M: You understand how interesting that is. Of course, when you imply the same reality, of course it energizes with more potency.

S: Okay.

M: Good morning and once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. There is so much that operates in the wider scheme of existence that, from the physical perspective, is yet little more than a drop in the bucket. A little speck within the frameworks and the fields of existence.

Universal Languages: Mathematics and Music

M: I want to talk, as you have pointed out, regarding the connection between the two Universal languages – mathematics and music – because these are vibrational schemes. Vibrational systems that operate well beyond the physical nature that their expression is within.

spherical co-ordinatesAnd it is for this reason that the descriptions of Universal principles are both described by mathematics and expressed in terms of cosmic vibrations. One then must consider the valuable understanding that a thing is as it seems only because of the perception of the one [person] that is observing it.

So you could say then, that the beauty of the cosmic structure, as it is described in mathematical terms, is so much presented in the fluxes, the flows and the harmonies given to it in terms of music. Sitting within the middle of these two, what you would love to know, is that dance, that is, the rhythmical outpouring in terms of spacial arrangements, is both mathematical and musical at the same time. [I presume he is talking about geometry and spacial mathematics]

A: Perfect.

space-time_warpM: So let us begin then with understanding that all things operate within the framework of the fields. That is, as we have described before, within space and time. [lots of material on Einstein’s equation and space and time] You understand there cannot be any music as such, without the time and the language of music defines the degree of the extensions of the fields of existence.

That is then, something exists within space over a period of time. There is an existing scheme in which something is “allowed” to exist. Mathematics describes it in terms of its relationship between the ultimate indescribable and the smallest structure possible, that is a singularity.

When something begins to approach a singularity it is arriving at its beginnings. At it’s ultimate expression. You understand where all gravity has increased. (A: OK, I admit, my eyes are starting to cross at this point…) All mass, all of the weight of the creation approaches its ultimate at its point of singularity. [some references to calculus?]

Everything is being sucked into the originated and it is, from that point of differentiation, that the field in which something exists such as the relationship between vibrative tones, one with another, and the emptiness between. Language and music is ultimately inter-connected.

A: Right. I can’t quite picture what you mean about coming down to the singularity and sucking it in.

singularityM: Understand, everything emerges from its conceptual point.

A: Yep I get that.

M: And the creation, as it exists, contains all of its components at that point. Everything, all of the gravity of it, all of the substance of it, all of the idea of it, all of the sense of it, has to emerge from that initial singularity. [as a quantity approaches infinity another parameter goes to zero]

A: OK. So all the elements… is that the right word?

M: Of course.

A: OK. So they produce all at the same time…

M: Of course, they are all contained within the singularity that emerges out to its descriptor. That is the boundary in which it exists.

(A: These boundaries are explained in more detail later on. If you have no boundaries for it to exist in the physical world, it remains a dream or a concept without taking physical form.)

Law of Attraction

M: For example, you want to have an experience. The creation occurs at that point where one casts it into the environment. It populates its own field. It is a container of its own self including all of its own field, everything in it. So many similarities with other creations that they overlap, overshadow, one another. So you create a world where you are creating your own business. However you have already created your own location in your own city. You have already created your own house and your own furniture and your own children and your own vehicle, your own sense of your self, your own challenges, your own benefits, your own liabilities. You understand this?

A: Yes yes.

M: And as you create over the top, these ones then take on a stronger sense of reality. So a new creation comes with lots of boundaries

A: And baggage (laughs)

M: Of course.

A: So is it possible to create something pure without all that interference from all the other things? Is it possible to do that in this 3D world?

M: You understand, One has to begin by taking off the energy invested in the previous creations

(A: You can often sense energy is stronger around something by gauging your emotions. eg – if you feel extreme happiness and joy or extreme anger or fear about something, you are investing more energy in that thought pattern which makes it stronger, regardless of whether it is a positive or negative vibe.)

A: Yes

M: … and that is why it is important, for the idea, that you can’t simply think yourself into a different environment when the environment already exists. This is related to what I began to talk about. That is the mathematics and the music of it. First of all one has to understand that the creation is the expression in harmonic terms. It is fitting together because it all sounds so true. Do you follow?

Stepping up to a higher vibe

M: It is all within the symphony One has already created and let us say you want to change the tonality of your symphony, you are likely to put notes in that which do not quite fit. They are dis-harmonic. [discordant?]

A: Yes, so you almost need to remove the manuscript and start again.

M: Let us say, first of all, the music sounds a little disrupted, a little dis-harmonious, a little – shall we call it – modern. Do you understand what I mean?

A: (laughs) Yes I do.

M: You understand, it clashes…

A: Until it all fits into the new tone.

M: Of course. At the same time, one is beginning to realise that the structure of the new creation has still to meet its mathematical limits. It has to fit within the same structure and one simply has to begin to change the formulas that one is operating out of.

A: Right. That makes sense.

musical_maths_iterationM: So you could say then, from a mathematical point of view, one is looking at the ideas that you have in place such as “the world must follow its ongoing pathway”, shall we say. And yet, from the mathematical point of view, from a more mechanical point of view, if a new energy comes into a closed system as such, it will indeed disrupt the system. Shall we say a judiciously placed energy, such as a billiard ball coming in, will change the trajectory of the future.

A: Yes

M: So you understand you are considering such a thing in terms of what size? That is what amount of energy? What amount of solid commentary? Certainty? Something that contains a certain degree of solid certainty will have more impact on the trajectory than something one is unsure of. What follows would be less solid.

A: Yes. So if I put this back into physical terms rather than big world, planet terms, in somebody setting up a business, if they are setting it on the wrong tones, then they aim to change their formula so that they can create something that’s different from what they’ve done before. If they are unsure of that then they’ll probably fall back into their old patterns. Right?

M: That is the case. The question here is to recognise that the first new import will create dis-harmony.

A: Yes yes

M: You understand. So you are going along in a certain way and you choose to make changes. The first thing that happens of course is that your children begin to play up.

A: (laughs) They are disrupted.

M: They do not like change, of course. So one has to persevere with the new music. One begins to continue with what seems dis-harmonious as it changes into the new…

A: tones

M: … tones. The new symphony. The new structure of the music. And move out of what you would call your classical tones into something more upbeat and Jazz.

A: (laughs)

M: You understand why I choose that is because Jazz is syncopated and that is a very useful word to come to grips with because it is a shift, not only in tonalities but in pace. [syncopate – to omit something from the middle, such as beat in music, or sounds in speech]

A: In rhythm, yes. But in a deliberate way. Not a chaotic way.

M: Of course. We are not talking about creating chaos. We are talking about shifting the quality of the music, the style, and at the same time putting into place a different structure, a different boundary. Sometimes a creation is limited by its perception, by its size, by its shape because some creations have solid walls around them. They are not fluid and any creation that is not governed by the mathematics of fluids but governed by the mathematics of solid form. Limited solid form, at that. Then the point I am making…

A: Is anything really that solid?

M: Not at all! Only in the…

A: The perception, right.

Linking back to Differentiation and Integration

(A: ie – go out and explore or find a new idea, bring it back and incorporate to change the current situation)

M: You understand. And this is why the science and mathematics of differentiation and integration are important because they are fluid mechanisms for setting a new framework. Do you follow?

One begins one’s new creation first of all, in exploratory terms. One has not yet set any new boundaries because it is essential to explore, but it is also essential to finally set a boundary in which to integrate from. If you do not have any boundaries then of course, the creation is endlessly fluid and takes no solid form. [Calculus – differentiation describes the boundary line; integration describes the area under the line (what the boundary contains)]

(A: This reminds me very much of the work I do with highly creative people in my coaching. Sometimes they are so caught up in the creating of new ideas and exploring the potential that they create nothing in solid form and it is my job as a coach to help them decide on some boundaries to they can bring it to fruition.)

M: Do you understand what I am getting at? Because when you look at this, when you re-read our conversation you will see that I am laying down the foundation to truly recognise the principles and process of setting a creation into place. First of all, by creating (shifting) the old creations in fluid terms. Taking away…

A: … the boundaries.

M: … the boundaries by having integrated them in totality. Understanding the entirety of the creation and releasing it from its reference co-ordinates.

(A: So when you create a business, like in the example above, based on your current co-ordinates of not getting along with people, not being good a managing money, unsure of yourself etc., it is necessary to loosen up the “solidness” of those old ideas about yourself and making them more fluid in order to start running this business differently from how you might have done in the past.)

M: They have references co-ordinates in terms of who you are. You limit yourself by descriptions of who I am, what I can do, where I am focussed, how I see myself. These are limitations that only appear to be solid because they have been set in limited solid mathematical formula.

(A: ***Excellent journalling exercise to look at each of these questions and making them more fluid.)

A: Right. We haven’t talked much about maths through this. I completely understand what you’re saying in musical terms. Um, so you are coming back to… talking about the creation of Self now, aren’t you?

M: I am talking about the creation of all things.

A: Yes

M: Because when one is creating from the singularity, it comes from within.

A: Yes

M: The first edge that it meets is the idea you have of yourself. [Identity]

A: Yes

M: Then it reaches the boundary of what it feels to be like that. Then of course it reaches the boundary of the physical body with all of its failures.

A: (laughs)

M: You understand, how one criticises one’s physical looks, one’s weight, one’s structure and so on it goes. Then of course, it meets the next boundary of how you are seen by others. Of course, you are not seen by others in that way at all. It is your own projection of the ideas and how you feel about that. Do you follow what I mean?

(A: This is like the Four Agreements book in Toltec Wisdom that all the world is a reflection of yourself. If you see yourself as not worthy, the world will reflect back evidence that you are not only not worthy but that it looks as though other people think you are not worthy. Sometimes this will be blatant and they really will think that because they have picked up on your vibe. Other times what they say and do is interpreted by you to mean they think you are not worthy when they didn’t mean it that way at all.)

A: Yes

M: So often there is even a disparity between what you think of yourself and what you think others think of you. (A: eg – you think you are quite bright but you think others see you as not intelligent and they misunderstand you. Even this thought pattern will be reflected back to match.) Then your physical environment begins to hold you into more and more solid structures, all of which have mathematical formulas to describe. They are solid plane formulations.

A: And it feels like the New Epoch is certainly not about that. So we need to find a way to break down those barriers. And I understand being totally present means that I don’t think about who I am or what I look like or what anybody else thinks of me. It doesn’t occur to me at all.

M: That is correct and of course, in terms of your modern mathematics, your physics and your astro-physics and so on, all the of the formulas that are used offer differentiating points which offer up the degree of probability.

Probability and Possibility – Making it happen!

M: Probabilities that are in some way related to possibilities. Do you understand?

A: No, I don’t get this.

probability_vs_possibility

M: Let us put it this way. You want to achieve something in your life and you begin to formulate the idea.

Step One – Create the Possibility – First of all, you have to make it a possibility.

A: Right

M: If there’s no possibility at all, what a waste of time. You have to consider the physical reality and the physical body. If you are a heavier person then being a racing horse rider is unlikely. You have to do an awful lot… do you follow what I mean?

A: Yes I do

M: The possibility becomes more difficult. However, if it’s within the possibilities of life then you have to stream out from that singularity the concept of possibility. And in doing so, one will notice how it interacts with the existing creation. You understand, if you want to be the jet setter one has to realise, what will happen to your children?

A: Right (laughs)

M: Because they will do everything in their power to override your creation.

A: That’s right. Well at the moment I think I’ve been creating the idea of me in a new car, a little yellow car that I like. That’s easier for them to integrate, I think.

M: Of course. Then the possibility is in existence already. You are beginning to see what that could be.

Step Two: Sense it in your Imagination

M: Then you begin to put yourself in it. You start to sense the feel. What is it like when you put your key in the door? If you unlock your little red vehicle.

A: Yellow!

M: Yellow, of course!

A: (laughs)

M: You open it up and the smell is so fresh. All of this …

A: So you connect with the senses and the emotional side of it.

M: Of course. That is making it more probable.

A: Right, so that changes the tone. So what kind of disruption would there be there? If we looked at that case of “here’s my old car and I’m dreaming of a new yellow car”…

Step Three: Finding the un-harmonious tones

M: Then you go into your existing structure. Where does the new dream clash as it were with the existing? First of all, there has to be plenty of money.

A: Right

M: There has to be so much that it is not even much of a choice but an important necessity for your yellow car. The probability then, you are making it fit. As you begin to do that, immediately you start to sense a different rhythm. A dis-harmonious tone begins to sound, as it were, in the music of your creation.

A: Right, so in order to keep with the new tones, even though it will be dissonant for a while, to just continue … it’s Law of Attraction basically, isn’t it, to…

M: Of course.

A: … to continue seeing myself in that car and the emotions and the senses and continue to do that, then the tone must change.

M: And continue to realise that the music is changing its sound and its place. You are not trying to impose something on the top of something else. You are shifting to a certain degree out of alignment with the existing.

(A: This is an important part of Law of Attraction. Even if it’s only in your mind, imagine you are changing to this new tune. Don’t keep looking for the evidence that nothing has changed. Whatever you look for is what you will find.)

M: We have talked in the past about how one’s alignment to the present has to be different for a future to be different as it goes forward. Remember we talked about changing your past.

A: Yes, the pivot point.

M: Of course.

A: Yes.

M: You understand why I am saying what I am saying?

A: So you talked about, there’s got to be plenty of money to buy the yellow car and if I perceive that to be a solid boundary then that is no longer a probability, is it.

M: Of course.

Step Four: Remove the Solidness of the Limitations

A: So in order to remove that boundary, do we just move our focus away from the fact there are not the funds to buy the yellow car? Do we just move back to the fun of being in the car?

M: Not at all. One has to look at the solid nature and understand how is it that it became so fixed? Why is it that you have such an investment in it being solid?

(A: Another superb journalling exercise!)

A: Right (laughs) I see.

M: And of course, as one realises that it is solid because you have described it to yourself.

A: Right. So it’s my perception of it being solid that is the only thing that makes it solid.

M: Of course. And if you consider it for a moment and to rename it as “not solid”. That is being able to shift it into the exploration modality. That is, “if I am to embody this creation as it is and I engulf myself in it then, immediately I feel its constraints.” You accept it as it is then begin to explore it’s weak points.

A: Oh, I see. So rather than turning away from it, you engulf yourself in it and then explore the edges.

(A: See how different this is from what we often do? Usually we fight against the limitations but the harder we fight, the bigger the obstacle becomes. If instead, we just accept that this has been the status quo up till now, then explore for where the story doesn’t quite match, explore where new options could open up, that is how we make the limitation more fluid and it is easier to overcome.)

M: Exactly. Realise that the edges are its weakest point because they are not solid as such. They are only the boundaries one has applied. Then you can explore a little further. What will happen on the other side if you were to expand this part of the boundary? If you were to change it’s shape? If you were to put holes in it?

A: Right (laughs)

M: You understand, by doing such, it becomes again fluid, more expandable and then you begin to realise what is it that lies beneath? Because as we have pointed out, these are layers upon layers upon layers, fundamental ideas begun in the history of time.

Carrying old ideas and limiting beliefs forward

A: Yes. Do we need to recognise those before we can remove them?

M: Only when they exist (for you). Only when they are imposing their nature upon the creation. Something that you don’t think about is just as important as what you know.

A: Right but if you’re influenced by something that was set in motion in the Collective Consciousness two thousand years ago…

M: And you are still energising…

A: Yes

M: … then it will still impact. If you are to take the ideas of your church with all of its history that was imbued into your life and you are operating within its constraints, of course it will overshadow all attempts to free yourself from the limited perspective you have.

(I have a feeling this, in my life, refers to my radio man with the ring)

A: So we do the same with this. If we decided that what we wanted to do was limited by the boundaries that the church set, then again you engulf yourself in it and then look for the weak points. Would that be right?

The expectations for male and female

M: Of course! Realise whether this is accurate, whether this still remains true and even so, what is it? For example, the ideas one projects about male and female impose huge qualities on the ideas of self and the physical world in which you exist. While either / or is in place the entire creation must apply. So if you think you have to work twice as hard to get anywhere because of your gender (being an woman) … Do you follow?

A: Yes I do

M: then of course

A: It’s true!

M: It’s more than true because the only way to change that is to change everybody else. Do you follow? Unless one realises “what nonsense! Nothing holds anybody back at all accepting the agreements.” You do not have to agree with anybody else because it is your Universe in its entirety. Even if others are experiencing a different one, one cannot (need not) agree with them in any way.

A: Yes I get that.

M: I realise that we are touching very deep.

A: Yes. I feel there are parts where I’ll really need to digest it again.

M: Of course and that is why it is certainly enough for today.

A: I think so, yes, but its been a wonderful conversation. I love the way that it continues on from last time. I’m sure we can continue on again next time too.

M: I want to say there is a lot to comment on when you begin to review what we have said.

A: I think so too, yes.

M: Then thank you for your time and we will talk again.

A: Thank you so much Mercredan.

M: Then Good Morning.

A: Good morning.

Before the session Francis and Annabelle were thinking about illness expressing inner turmoil and how that might compare to having your leg cut off. Also how language can be so misleading when people take a different meaning from the same word.

Topics: Soul family, The writers’ group, author, past lives, illness, descent, law of polarity, law of cycles, law of paradox, law of gravity, greater laws, 2 universal languages, masculine vs feminine, differentiating vs integrating, science evidence, intuition, pending disaster, world leaders, economy, ecology, mother earth, balancing the accounts before progression, rich vs poor

M: Good morning once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. It is so important to recognise that the only thing that gets in the way of anybody tapping in to the inner nature of Consciousness is the Self. In so many ways Human embodiment puts a dampener on the relationship between Self and the bigger Self, as it were, the Author. So important to recognise from that position, then you can begin to visualise the reality, the Universe one is occupying, and how it relates to others within it.

Then everybody in your World – every thing, every interaction, every inter-relationship, every dependency is inside the novel ideas that you are exploring in physical reality. Then such a thing, then, is the beginning of a storyline. However, as I am wanting to share next, then you belong one to another within what you would call the Soul Family. You have often heard the term. I am wanting to shift that a little. To call yourselves a “Writers Group”.

A: (laughs) OKwriter's-group

M: So you are sitting around with your typewriters and discussing what should next occur. Then one to the other you are identifying with your character and sharing it with another. Then, the unfolding novel is a co-conspiracy, a co-authorship that begins to support one another in the personal evolution. Does that offer an introduction to our next conversation?

A: It does and the analogy of the Author works well there too. If we are looking at the past lives that belong to the Author and within the writers group they use the same characters. Is that right? So you have the same Authors that mix the same characters within a life?

M: Of course. Let us say you are not a new Author but have many books upon the bookshelf. Shall we say that in most instances you have often been a Top Author as such.

A: Mm!

M: That is you have written many interesting stories in both historical times and in alternative ones. So you wanted to discuss the nature of physicality, the nature of the purpose of creating what you would call physical illness in order to explore how one is treated, how one requires a certain amount of attention. One needs the attention, one needs involvement because it is an important characteristic. If one was to, as you point out, lose a leg or an arm or whatever it is…

A: (laughs) yep

M: …does not disturb the exploration. It simply changes its direction. Often of course, one “donates” one’s limb because of certain difficulties, certain lifetime experiences…

A: Can you explain that more?

M: Let us suggest then, that in a certain time-frame One managed what I will call, to hack of another’s arm in battle, then the guilt of such an experience brings one to want to explore what such a lifetime would have been affected. So one donates the limb in order to rebalance and to understand what one brought to bear upon another.

A: So it may have been within the same character (lifetime) or it might be a new character that would lose the limb to simply understand how tough life would be.

M: That is correct.

A: I see.

M: You understand. Again of course it is only within the physicality of experience. As one progresses, one starts to understand all of it is as unnecessary and unneeded as Humanity turns.

A: Yes, so in the last session you and I were talking about having these old characters revisited and experiencing in an alternative parallel Universe as to how that may work out, that perhaps a character may not need to experience donating a limb but will get over the guilt instead. Is that what you mean?

M: That is correct.

A: Right, I get that.

M: And one has to understand that reality abides by certain rhythms. What one could call the greater laws that govern existence. That is greater than the physicality alone.

The Law of Cycles

law_of_cyclesM: There are certain rhythms that have been set up, certain patterns, certain evolutionary structures that apply in many dimensions such as the evolutionary cycle of repetition at a higher level. That is the spiralling approach as one moves through the ever returning fields as it were. In a larger context then, One has perhaps been referred to the Great Ages that keep repeating. That is a descent from the highest spiritual vision, that is into a certain level of perception and finally into the solid dimensions of which one can explore in a framework which is both consistent and linear in ways that allow experience to be integrated. I want then to talk about the law that governs polarity because we have touched upon it in the past. There are two counters…

A: May I just interrupt before we start on polarity? You were talking about repeating this fall from the higher dimensions.

M: And the return, of course.

A: The return and then we repeat it again?

M: Of course at a higher progress.

A: Spiralling up to the next bit.

M: Of course.

A: So as the Human species and the whole planet evolves and moves up to a different level, does that mean that we don’t fall as far (in the repetition)?

spiral_to_spiralM: Let us say this. Can you imagine a spiral within a spiral within a spiral? That is, you have a spring as such in which each filament of the spring is in fact another spring. An endless winding of which it in itself is yet another spiralling. Spirals – littler ones growing greater. So even within your own physical evolution there is a spiralling approach. One returns to events that One has not quite…

A: resolved?

M: … resolved …

A: Right

The Law of Polarity

Differentiating vs. Integrating

M: …and I want to bring in because it is important then to understand how this pattern still has to abide by the Law of Polarity. Polarity then, is the counter opposition of differentiation and integration. First of all One has to move into a particular experience. That is, One differentiates between past and the new. The old and the new. What One has already experienced – the known as  it is – moving into the unknown. To differentiate, to explore and experience and, as I like to add, to entertain Oneself.

A: (laughs)

M: To gather new experience and then to integrate it. To bring it back into your home and to toss around a little. To explore it in terms of what One has already experienced so that it begins to modify what you know, modify who you are. So everything needs the pattern of differentiation to explore and integration to settle.

calculus

A: OK

M: Then the spiralling evolution occurs simply from the pattern of movement and return. Taking in and integrating it. Taking it in and digesting it. Everything to explore it is to gather what is unknown, gather what is yet to be experienced, that is to learn. Do you understand?

A: I do

M: So differentiation and integration in all things and indeed in set patterns and set polarities. Everything, then, is either active or receptive.

A: Back to yin and yang again, aren’t we.law_of_polarity

M: Of course!

A: Yes

M: So you notice I am not saying passive.

A: No

M: One is not passive. One is receptive. One has tapped into that which has been stirred up. So the evolution of all things requires an Explorer and an Integrator. That is someone discovers a new truth, somebody puts it in…

A: Integrates it

M: Of course

A: Right. So we do this on our own though in lots of little way. Like you said, I go out of my home, I find an experience, I bring it back, toss it about and integrate it. But, the way you’re talking, it sounds like you’re talking about two characters that are required for this.

M: Of course. You understand this is where a new life begins. So one important pattern is to descend and to choose whichever side of the balance One is attempting. Everybody in little ways but, in bigger and bigger ways, there is the nature of exploration and the nature of integration. And to explore without integrating is pointless and destructive. To integrate without exploration will not produce anything new at all.

A: Exactly. So for me, because I have chosen a feminine gender for this character, then am I favouring the side of integration for …

M: Of course.

A: … for society though? I’m thinking on a bigger term.

M: Of course. For stability so that One is not forced into destructive by going in every direction and not putting it into practice. Not bringing it in and bedding it down, putting it into service for the growth of the family. That is the nature called nurturing. So then, One looks to what is out beyond and One brings it back to the fold.

A: That’s the masculine that does that though, right?

M: Of course and then, in the fold, it is used and put into practice as such – or put into service is a better quality. So you understand without exploration there is no evolution.

A: Right.

Science exploration and evidence

M: The result of course is the prominence of the truly scientific mind. Science then is the pattern of differentiation. To separate out and to review alternative explanations and then it is important that the task of proof – that is gaining enough evidence – so that it can be integrated.

A: Right and I wonder if that’s what’s often missing. That science will come up with a new discovery with not enough evidence behind it. Then everybody rushes off to match that and then finds it doesn’t lead anywhere.

M: Of course the evidence is what is so important and One should always consider the evidence in line with the intuitive.

A: I was just going to say that. Sometimes you just cannot get all the facts and yet your intuition will give you a different conclusion than if you had just looked at the facts (at hand).

Language – new names for old ideas

M: You understand that over many generations, many explorations, they have only simply proven what was already intuitively understood. And in order to protect that idea then One delivers a new label for it rather than calling it what it used to be called. This is one of the importances of understanding that language – names and so on – are really simply representations of something else. So when you create a new word or a new phrase, One needs to consider whether it is truly needed and what the differentiation is between the new definition and those of the past.

A: And whether you can get that message across to people or whether they end up with a different meaning for the same word.

M: Of course because One has to realise that the repetition of experience does not occur simply at the same vibration. So it is both true and false at the same time, that it is the same thing. So we begin to explore the law of Paradox.

The Law of Paradox, Cycles and Polarity

A: Yes indeed.

law_of_magneticismM: So this is how it fits together. The cyclic laws, the paradoxical laws and the law of Polarity. And in many ways other laws that seem to exist fit into all of those. So One wants to apply the law of magnetism. Yet the Law of Magnetism requires the Law of Polarity because you cannot attract something that is not polarised in opposition…

A: Mm, there’s no charge.

M: Of course. So One has to develop the charge. That is to bring about the ultimate desire and that then is to identify the differentiation, the differences. You understand what I mean? There is so much to be learned because of the mathematics – and we have simply not touched upon the universal languages.

Two Universal Languages

universal_languageM: The two of them. One is the masculine arm and one is the feminine. The Universal languages of mathematics and music. 

A: Mm! Yes that will make a great conversation. This has brought something to my mind. I was sent a package a couple of years ago now which was automatic writing of the link between Quantum Physics and Mathematics. I have held onto these pages and not known what to do with them. Have you any suggestion for what would be a good way for me to get that out to the right people who would find the information useful?

M: Always a challenge, isn’t it? To recognise the connections between the intellectual and the intuitive. That is the connection between the fundamentals of logic and the fundamentals of harmony. You understand, music most often meets the logical framework at a metaphysical level. One could then talk a treatise about the mathematical formulas of a great Beethoven symphony. The mathematics are quite stunning…

A: I bet (laughs)

M: … as indeed are the colours that it produces. So there is such a benefit. However what an important and interesting consideration.

A: It is it is. I find there is so much in the research for the music I use in my work with the radio station at the moment, many of the descriptions are very logical, mathematical descriptions and yet I just want to talk about the emotion of it.

M: Of course because One cannot separate the masculine from the feminine.

A: You must have both.

Pending disaster

M: Of course! And not only must you have both but they must be in dynamic harmony and if you do not approach it in that way then there will be and is at the present time, a disaster pending. So we might entreat the balance between moving forward – that is keeping a stable and growing economy – in balance with a stable and growing ecology. So economy and ecology are both on the same balance. One will affect the other and One cannot simply want the greatest possible economy without truly damaging the ecology.

A: Yes. Is this the pending disaster you can see?

M: Of course. And One should remember this. That there is nothing worse than a thwarted woman.

A: This is Mother Earth?

M: Of course. Mother Earth is unhappy with the nature of how things have been progressed.

A: So is she able to express herself and correct the economy?

M: Of course but only in a very destructive way.

A: That’s what I expected.

M: In other words how will you first carry on? How will you first bring it to bear but by absorbing the economy. That is by requiring more and more of it to be used simply to stand still? Do you understand?

A: No

M: If you destroy the factory then, everything that you made, all of the profit that you made, has to be spent on rebuilding the very factory and so on. There is no profit in the longer term.

A: So are we moving too slowly as a species in getting our balance right?

M: Human Beings do not like to be held back. They do not want to take responsibility and I have pointed out in the changing age, in the new Epoch, we have already said there will be responsibility, accountability and transparency. And these qualities will become more and more brought to bare.

A: Right. So is there any way that we as a species can… appease Mother Earth? Can we, can we … (sigh) I just can’t see how we can get these politicians to change their viewpoint.

M: Of course but one should not blame the leaders one puts into …

A: (laughs) We voted them in.

M: Of course, even in such places where you do not think there is the voting as such, the leaders are still upheld, the leaders are still in their positions because of the support of many.

A: Yes. England is a very good example of that. Their poles seem to be so extreme in voting one way or the other. It seemed very fake to me.

M: Put it this way. Human Beings are still to learn the lessons of greed.

A: Yes

M: In the end there is no alternative because within the nature of balance, the Law of Polarity cannot be overturned because somebody wants it not to apply. It is just the same as jumping off your building and …

A: Saying the Law of Gravity doesn’t exist.

M: Of course. You have your King who sat on the shore and banished the waves. I mean what stupidity…

A (laughs)

M:… does Human Beings arise to?

A: That’s our entertainment, Mercredan! (laughs)

M: Of course it is the entertainment! and of course it has a little in the long term of importance. One simply thinks that a lifetime where One has everything is going to sustain One but of course in the end the balance has still to be reenacted.

So the old rich as such, who have not put their wealth into service for others, will indeed have to experience, or rather will choose to experience, what it is like on the other side.

A: Mm mm.

M: And even in their Authorship they are already indeed in the experience of it.

A: So the Author has already planned this out in the future? Is that what you mean?

M: I am saying that even in the novel there is still those that are suffering and the Author already has to have identified with it. You understand. The Author cannot avoid both sides of the battles.

A: Mm they must address both sides.

M: And One cannot progress into the new Epoch without One’s accounts being in balance. That is the point of responsibility. It is your responsibility to put your accounts into balance. It is until you take that responsibility there cannot be any progression into the new framework as such.

A: Mm ok.

M: Is that enough for today?

A: Yes, that felt quite a lot. Is there a good way for us to close this conversation?

M: One would have to ask whether you want it closed…

A: No! No just for today. I mean there’s plenty more to talk about.

M: …or would it be the beginnings for exploring more of these patterns?

A: Yes! I would love to know more about the patterns.

happinessM: Then thank you for your time and your attention and I want to suggest more presence, more being in the moment and being happy in the moment.

A: OK

M: Happiness is to be imposed rather than an expectation.

A: Hm!

M: That is enough for today. Then thank you and good morning.

A: Thank you Mercredan.

(Comments to this channelling are made in red)

M: Good afternoon. Once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. At the beginning of every great movement there is always a shift in the nature of experience, a shift in the way that human beings operate and relate to one another. In the past, then, as the great descent occurred, so many things, so many ideas were lost in the framework that that represents. So often you are wondering, “Why is it that the past does not seem to have left behind even a minimal trail, as if… How is it that an entire history can overlook what went before?” So that is enough to continue our conversation as it has been. So let us begin.

S: Wow. That was kind of. Um… I’m really not… I began to think about my prior lifetimes that you were were discussing in a prior session, and wondering if that’s what you were referring to, that somehow I keep repeating my own history over and over again. Is that what you were saying?

M: Let us say that we began a discussion about the past, the Old Age and the old conditions, what you have called the land of Mu and the land of Atl, so that is Atlantis and Lemuria. And wondering why there are no physical markers of such great passages as it were.

possible_location_Mu

S: Yes. [I am thinking Annabelle knows way more about all this than I do! Is he confusing us?]

M: And in the last episode we discussed what the difference was between what we called the Third evolution and the Fourth. [3rd & 4th Root races?] That is, how is it that those that came from the astral planes, from those places where desires took precedence. So it is that the magnetic qualities began to separate out individuality in terms of one’s owning one’s own concept — one’s emotions and their impact.

The quality of magic as it is understood. That later began to physicalize in what you call the age of the Atlanteans. Unfortunately, such [long pause] structures only required environments because one at that point could live within the boundaries of one’s own necessary creation. One could build a castle in the air! [he is talking about the mental plane?] One could imagine, like an architect, one’s castle and quite cozily live within it. So the physicality of such a system was not truly brought into place until the very last vestiges of it, and there are such remaining structures still evident in your current place. [physical buildings from the last atlantean phase?] Such are the great pyramids, not just in what you call Egypt but in many other places as well, some of which are under your oceans and some are buried under debris and indeed the icepack.

S: And those are the remnants of what little physical material there was from Atlantis.

M: That is correct. Prior to that. So at the end of that realm, that consciousness, there emerged a new beginning which was entirely in the physical realm, beginning of course at early man and their necessary interaction with the physical plane in the need to build in solid terms such structures in which to house and to shelter.

4_YugasS: So that was a further descending.

M: Of course. And at a certain turning point, one begins to emerge as what you would call science and physicality, and the desire to ascend began to take place in what you would (in your current conservative estimation) call the Reformation. The re-formation? Of course not! Many other cultures were much further advanced at that time. But evolution as such began to bring humanity out of its own descent into physicality. One began to value human relationships, interactions. Began to understand the nature of helpfulness and friendship, and eventually the nature of ideas and creations. At the point at which you would call the turning, now is the ascent into the next less physical framework, much more at the Atlantean building of one’s own castles in which one can indeed shelter. [Is he signalling a return to the previous mental Atlantean planes of existence?]

S: Got it. So have we descended now as far as we’re going to descend? Now we’re all going to be able to ascend back?

M: As we have pointed out, there is a necessary need to value the inner workings before one can truly identify with them. The result is the separation of two distinct universal viewpoints. And of course one can only create inside of one’s basic ideas. So one creates reality from the ideas and the potentials one allows oneself to experience.

S: Okay. [I feel discouraged, as if Mercredan is telling me my viewpoint is too limited to progress on my own. I’m afraid I’m going to get left behind in the old framework!] Is there a reason that our dear friend and our sweet Australian friend and I will all be together in a month or so, here?

M: There is of course the willingness. One has worked for many years to arrive at the point where one is willing to integrate with another. That is, to truly accept others into one’s framework. And, as my dear friend was picking up, taking on our analogy of the author of one’s own experience, the author not only of one’s personal experience but the identification with the characters within that creation. When you co-create each other, one then begins to understand the nature of the authors’ collective. Then you begin to support each other in one’s personal evolution. Because you begin to write in your own novel such evolutionary experience. So you move out of creating one’s own personal reality to co-creating a shared reality. [reference here to working together in ‘the team’ as Merc has already explored. The writer’s cooperative writing another into your own novel. A very provocative idea of ‘integrating with another in order to truly understand their perspective and writing that into your own narative.]

S: And I think that’s where I was going with the question. Are the actions we’re currently taking, co-creating, somehow going to helpful to all of us to ascend better?

M: That is the point. One begins to integrate not just on an intellectual level, but one begins to understand the nature of what one would call “bleed.” That is experiences of one and another emerging into a shared reality. The question then is openness to such an experience. Allowing another not only to see the physical or to share some portions of self, but allowing others into the most intimate places of life, without judgement, so you are learning: “Is it possible to trust another without having to suffer from criticism?”

S: Right. And I kind of feel when I sit in this chair that I’m doing that with Mercredan — that I’m giving permission, just by being here, for Mercredan to see everything there is to see about me.

M: And that, of course, is an obvious reality. The question is, “What is Mercredan as such? What is it that we are exploring together?” [Is he asking S to find her own Mercredan inside? Is he suggesting that ‘her’ Mercredan is a character in ‘her’ novel? Interesting concept!]

S: We’ve asked ourselves that question.

M: If you think it is some “thing” that is attached to my dear friend, then there is an exclusory nature to that. However, if it is a space like a room in which you can enter in, then all that my dear friend is doing is holding open the door while you join in the party! Then you begin to understand how to invite others in and not only that, but you begin how to open the door for yourself, for your own… For everybody has their own doorway and their own key to this space. So there is no exclusion, only getting prepared, only being safe enough to enter in, to find out what you will find out. Because if all things are to be accessible, even one’s worst fears can be unleashed if one is not maintaining one’s sense of management.

So it is important that you remain the master of your own (unfolding?) (involvement?). That you are not, shall we say, like the sorcerers’ apprentice, delving into the book before you are ready for its magic. [He is warning to have some understanding before you fly single?] There are many stories of this, of tinkering without having all of the training. So it is important that you come into this position with guidance, with someone who will manage that you are not overly exposed. Do you understand this? [Merc is preparing the way to touch base with your own Higher Self/Consciousness]

S: Yes, but who’s to provide that guidance?

M: Let us say my dear friend has managed quite well in that regard.

S: He has?

M: That is correct. And before him, his own teacher managed that involvement of course. [Referring to Margaret] There was an evolution necessary in order that he was able to manage this. You understand why in the past safety has been such a big concern, that one asks the ascended beings and so on to provide protection, because you cannot trust yourself from (building? tinkering?).

Lifetime threadsI want to give an example. Because you asked about lifetimes. Of course we could simply open the book and allow all the lifetimes to flood out, and then you would be overwhelmed and carried away with all sorts of emotions that are unimportant in the scheme of things. However, as a human being without such training, one would pick upon some item and magnify it into a destructive force in your life. So when we are exploring such lifetimes, we allow only the necessary to be exposed. Only enough so that you can manage that experience. [referring to delving into hundreds of past-lives which he claims are only lives with which you, in this experience, resonate with. The you might build yourself to be self-important, or unworthy and act that out, instead of living your life to the fullest.]

S: I understand. Our dear friend told me once that he thinks of Mercredan as just an expression of his own higher self. But you said that we all can access that space…

M: Let us put it this way. The doorway that you are entering into the space through is the dressing room of Mr. Mercredan! And next door is your own doorway with its own star on it! It is your own dressing room, however, inside is the same space. [Nice way of saying you are the star on your own tonight show]

S: Right. So at some point in this ascension that we’re all hoping and striving for and trying to create, will we all be able to go through that door and access that space at some point, if we really want to get there?

M: Provided one is open and willing, provided one is not clouding the waters with one’s ideas that are carried along. But you have to understand that for many people, they have other driving forces clouding the way. For example, if you want to be filled with… want to gain fame and want followers, then of course that will cloud the open space, and you will only see what is inside through that filter and through the Merc that that will put in place. [another warning to stay clear of desires]

S: Okay. So is there a way for… We are so caught up in being in the story, it seems to me there is no way to know how clouded up our own stuff is…

M: Let yourself go. Let yourself ascend at least back into the office — that is, behind the typewriter, being the author. Then you can look down at your creation. You can look down at your story, and often when you are writing a story you are not so happy with the character that you have created. The question is this: “What event would you put in place that would suddenly awaken this character to their true higher purpose?” Do you follow what I mean?

S: Kind of. It’s hard for me to imagine what that would be. [This seems to be the biggest challenge for most people. There seems to me to be a connection between passion and purpose. In NLP we often talked about ]

M: If you take yourself out of your life and you look at it in the whole, what is missing? What is it that has been returned, if you like, planted as a pearl in the ground to be picked up, and that one has simply missed it? It is not about judging the character. It is about the evolution of a being from its early beginnings to a rounded point where they are ready to pass out of the physical world. So if you look at yourself with compassion, without judgements or criticisms, only looking at, “What could happen? What is it that this Great Being is missing? Just a little pearl and how would I place it in front of them? What is it that she worries about? What is it that she carries on inside herself about? What is it that she rails against?” All of these are simply markers trying to get you to pick up the pearl! [You might pick this up as a criticism, but I sense that he is suggesting that you are on the verge of making sense of your entire life. Like finding a key to a puzzle that has stumped you for years. I feel its an exciting prospect.]

S: I am so obtuse, I just can’t see the pearl! I feel like I’ve got markers everywhere and I’m still missing it!

M: Of course, that is the point. Because you are trying too hard. You are trying, and in the end there is a subtle judgement that you are not smart enough, that you are not clean enough, you are not spiritual enough. There is many criticisms, instead of looking at what is in front of you. That is, stop it all and be present! And when someone comes into your life, be present for them. And this is what we are hoping to occur is that when all of your are accumulated in a single spot, you will understand and learn how to be present. [I hope we will have time and space to make this happen.]

S: Oh, that would be fabulous!

M: You understand, not in the mind, but totally present in the extraordinary moment that will happen. So all of the excuses are simply what they are. Being present is an extraordinary opportunity. So that one of the advantages is that when people get to be present together, they alter their fields, they help each other to generate a field of compassion, acceptance, and freedom from criticism. So then when others come into the field, then they will find pure acceptance. [Is he giving a subtle hint here of what to work on?]

S: Okay.

M: Then you have less need to explain yourself. Less need to engage yourself. “Engaging” being on a mental level, that is by talking and so on. Simply being present in the moment. So there is time to engage that ability.

S: I was hoping for that, but we’ll see.

M: I want to point out that you may not have connected our introduction to this level of being. You are eager to engage in the pathway of evolution, that is shifting to what was the Atlantean age in its (eternal? this would make sense) (returning ?) journey. Shifting from the negative and self-absorbed nature of magic into the personal use of magic for the benefit of the evolution of humanity. [what do you know about Huna? Who do you know who does know about it? Hawaiian magic]

S: Yeah. In my conscious thinking that’s what I want. But I have a feeling that underneath it all, I’m stuck back on the other of being self indulgent and self absorbed. I don’t want to be, but I think I must be because I’m still stuck in the story. [my question is “who would you be if you weren’t you? If you put down the book and stopped reading, what sort of person would write such a story?”]

M: You mentioned in your previous conversation that you have the results of an accident holding you in a certain place, and yet it was no accident that such an “accident” came simply as a mechanism to stop what you were indulging in.

S: I hear what you’re saying. I don’t know what it is I was indulging in.

law-and-paradoxM: I suggest that you review the circumstances. Not the event, but the circumstances of the life at that time. And understand that such a shock can be both holding one up, holding one back, and catapulting one into a different position. The paradox is that opposite extremes fold in upon themselves. The law of paradox suggests that once one arrives at the outer extreme, that is the outermost extremity, one suddenly realizes that the two arms of the paradox are consistent. They are the same thing! [He once described the Law of Paradox as two extremes that are both true and false at the same time, and that once you arrive fully at one extreme you discover it is actually the opposite extreme wrapping around itself, if I’ve got that right.]

S: I kind of understand. I’m still not sure what you’re saying about that particular accident that wasn’t an accident. I just need some time to go back to that time in my life and try to remember what was going on specifically. Other than my next door neighbour issue, I’m not sure…

M: You understand, not just your next door neighbour, but those that are close by. That neighbour, of course, is a part of self. You cannot escape from your projections onto others. Does that make sense?

S: It does. It’s still a quandary to me about how to get out of… It feels like I’m in a well and I’m not sure what I see except tall sides I don’t see it yet, but maybe I will after I listen to it again a few time and hear what you’re saying more. Right now I don’t know how to translate what you’re saying into what I know consciously. [I think he’s saying that you’re separating yourself out from the novel, and your character is becoming victim to another of your characters. Of course, you wrote both of them into the story, and it would be a poor story without some drama! If you can’t or won’t laugh at the character then you remain trapped in the story. If you see them both equally, then you become the author, and can review the relationship.]

M: I will leave it at this point, because one has to know when enough is enough. When enough fuel on the fire is enough for it to get started again. Because you need to regenerate. You need to release all of the tied up energy in that experience. [he’s saying that you’re wasting energy on the right-wrong game, rather than the pearl of wisdom this scene contains]

S: Hmmm. It felt like it got released when the problem went away. I don’t know how to do what you’re saying. It’s kind of like the hose that I thought was empty, but seems there must be more water in the line that I don’t know is there, and it must be affecting me. Could you explain this just a little bit more?

M: I want to say that whatever is residual is residual because you are feeding it with yourself. You are holding yourself back as a result of that interaction. You know what I mean. You are using the experience, the non-accident accident as a method for stopping yourself being at risk.

S: Oh! Okay. So. Hmmm. Well, I’ll think on that one. I wonder what I’m at risk of. Hmmm. [many people run the fear of the unknown. Don’t do anything that you can’t control, that you haven’t got all the information on. The new humans seem to be willing to take huge risks, because they think there isn’t anything they can’t recover from. They know they create it all anyway]

M: Do you understand, that if you go outside, then you become more at risk. You are ever more exposed to the risks of life. And underneath that risk of life is the idea that you are not safe within it. When one assumes one is not safe within life, one then makes life physical. And when one makes life physical, one begins to avoid life because the ultimate end point is death. All of this is because one does not truly believe that death is yet another doorway into a new experience. It is not yet the exciting possibility that it truly is. [saying, “what’s your problem with Death?”]

S: But on a conscious level, that IS what I think! [I cannot even believe I am arguing with Mercredan!] As I sit here, I’m excited about death.  It does seem like a new door, and a new adventure, and a continuation. [Is he tapping into something to do with the “neighbour”? Or the “accident”? It seems as if this is where the discussion came from]

M: I will leave you to ponder on that.

S: Oh, that’s going to be a deep one to try to figure out.

M: I am going to suggest not to figure it out, but to ponder on it. Put it into the pot and boil it up so that it can open its petals. That you are not thinking and trying to dig it apart, but you are enticing it to show its beauty.

S: Okay. Thank you Mercredan. I’ll try. We’ll hope that the fire catches from that. [very long pause] Is there anything else you’d like to say before we end this?

M: I have noth… Only if you have a question. Once again, stirring the infinite with questions is the best way to bring forth that which is ready to be understood.

S: I do have another question, then, that I’d [like] to ask, something that’s been on my mind in follow up to a discussion we had awhile ago. You said that the first step that we have is we choose to enter this world, to assume physicality, is to be in the physical body and say, “I am awake.” At what point does the soul enter the physical body to begin to have the experiences of physicality? Is it before our physical birth? Can you explain that?

M: One expects that there is a single moment, but it is much more like trial and error. Most often, this is the normal, a soul will test its developing vehicle at early stage, coming in and orienting itself into the model, and begins to influence its general appearances. Often then it will come back at the time what is called the “quickening.” There begins to be movement and an attempt to fit in the body, to gain some sort of control over its operating system as it were. Then one might at this point choose which gender one is going to most usefully work with.

The most important thing is first of all there is the need to exist as a physical manifestation. One then chooses and moderates the physical vehicle into its gender. For others that often have a difficulty or a lack of willingness to incarnate in body as I would prefer, they might wait for quite a period of time. Then the baby, even after it is born, is often not fully embodied. The soul nature is still attempting to come to terms with the gravity of the situation.

Gravity is the degree of heaviness that every body has to deal with. Some people have a lightness of spirit and others have to deal with the gravity of their situation. So it is over some period of time that in the end all beings have descended into their permanent vehicles. And for others, they may retain a certain disposition; they have a certain connection outside so they remain quite consciously connected to the higher vibrations. [he is saying that a baby might not fully incarnate at birth. I wonder if some children never fully incarnate?]

S: You’re saying some souls after they incarnate can maintain a better connection than others.

M: Of course. They do not forget themselves into the physical nature of the world. And these ones often are what you would call quite perceptive, not just as you would say they are psychic, but they are more perceptive of what is happening around them.

S: I understand. Okay. That’s perfect. Thank you so much.

M: Is that enough for today?

S: It is. You’re absolutely wonderful and I appreciate it.

M: Then once again, such penetrating questions are invaluable as markers as you go forward in this fascinating life. Then thank you and good afternoon.

END

After what seemed like two or three minutes, Francis said, “That was difficult to get out, and difficult to get back. It was interesting. It seemed slow; I was just waiting. There is nothing in my mind,” so we have to go on total trust that this is going to connect to something.”