Before the session Francis and Annabelle were thinking about illness expressing inner turmoil and how that might compare to having your leg cut off. Also how language can be so misleading when people take a different meaning from the same word.

Topics: Soul family, The writers’ group, author, past lives, illness, descent, law of polarity, law of cycles, law of paradox, law of gravity, greater laws, 2 universal languages, masculine vs feminine, differentiating vs integrating, science evidence, intuition, pending disaster, world leaders, economy, ecology, mother earth, balancing the accounts before progression, rich vs poor

M: Good morning once again it is my privilege and pleasure to come and spend these few moments of your time. It is so important to recognise that the only thing that gets in the way of anybody tapping in to the inner nature of Consciousness is the Self. In so many ways Human embodiment puts a dampener on the relationship between Self and the bigger Self, as it were, the Author. So important to recognise from that position, then you can begin to visualise the reality, the Universe one is occupying, and how it relates to others within it.

Then everybody in your World – every thing, every interaction, every inter-relationship, every dependency is inside the novel ideas that you are exploring in physical reality. Then such a thing, then, is the beginning of a storyline. However, as I am wanting to share next, then you belong one to another within what you would call the Soul Family. You have often heard the term. I am wanting to shift that a little. To call yourselves a “Writers Group”.

A: (laughs) OKwriter's-group

M: So you are sitting around with your typewriters and discussing what should next occur. Then one to the other you are identifying with your character and sharing it with another. Then, the unfolding novel is a co-conspiracy, a co-authorship that begins to support one another in the personal evolution. Does that offer an introduction to our next conversation?

A: It does and the analogy of the Author works well there too. If we are looking at the past lives that belong to the Author and within the writers group they use the same characters. Is that right? So you have the same Authors that mix the same characters within a life?

M: Of course. Let us say you are not a new Author but have many books upon the bookshelf. Shall we say that in most instances you have often been a Top Author as such.

A: Mm!

M: That is you have written many interesting stories in both historical times and in alternative ones. So you wanted to discuss the nature of physicality, the nature of the purpose of creating what you would call physical illness in order to explore how one is treated, how one requires a certain amount of attention. One needs the attention, one needs involvement because it is an important characteristic. If one was to, as you point out, lose a leg or an arm or whatever it is…

A: (laughs) yep

M: …does not disturb the exploration. It simply changes its direction. Often of course, one “donates” one’s limb because of certain difficulties, certain lifetime experiences…

A: Can you explain that more?

M: Let us suggest then, that in a certain time-frame One managed what I will call, to hack of another’s arm in battle, then the guilt of such an experience brings one to want to explore what such a lifetime would have been affected. So one donates the limb in order to rebalance and to understand what one brought to bear upon another.

A: So it may have been within the same character (lifetime) or it might be a new character that would lose the limb to simply understand how tough life would be.

M: That is correct.

A: I see.

M: You understand. Again of course it is only within the physicality of experience. As one progresses, one starts to understand all of it is as unnecessary and unneeded as Humanity turns.

A: Yes, so in the last session you and I were talking about having these old characters revisited and experiencing in an alternative parallel Universe as to how that may work out, that perhaps a character may not need to experience donating a limb but will get over the guilt instead. Is that what you mean?

M: That is correct.

A: Right, I get that.

M: And one has to understand that reality abides by certain rhythms. What one could call the greater laws that govern existence. That is greater than the physicality alone.

The Law of Cycles

law_of_cyclesM: There are certain rhythms that have been set up, certain patterns, certain evolutionary structures that apply in many dimensions such as the evolutionary cycle of repetition at a higher level. That is the spiralling approach as one moves through the ever returning fields as it were. In a larger context then, One has perhaps been referred to the Great Ages that keep repeating. That is a descent from the highest spiritual vision, that is into a certain level of perception and finally into the solid dimensions of which one can explore in a framework which is both consistent and linear in ways that allow experience to be integrated. I want then to talk about the law that governs polarity because we have touched upon it in the past. There are two counters…

A: May I just interrupt before we start on polarity? You were talking about repeating this fall from the higher dimensions.

M: And the return, of course.

A: The return and then we repeat it again?

M: Of course at a higher progress.

A: Spiralling up to the next bit.

M: Of course.

A: So as the Human species and the whole planet evolves and moves up to a different level, does that mean that we don’t fall as far (in the repetition)?

spiral_to_spiralM: Let us say this. Can you imagine a spiral within a spiral within a spiral? That is, you have a spring as such in which each filament of the spring is in fact another spring. An endless winding of which it in itself is yet another spiralling. Spirals – littler ones growing greater. So even within your own physical evolution there is a spiralling approach. One returns to events that One has not quite…

A: resolved?

M: … resolved …

A: Right

The Law of Polarity

Differentiating vs. Integrating

M: …and I want to bring in because it is important then to understand how this pattern still has to abide by the Law of Polarity. Polarity then, is the counter opposition of differentiation and integration. First of all One has to move into a particular experience. That is, One differentiates between past and the new. The old and the new. What One has already experienced – the known as  it is – moving into the unknown. To differentiate, to explore and experience and, as I like to add, to entertain Oneself.

A: (laughs)

M: To gather new experience and then to integrate it. To bring it back into your home and to toss around a little. To explore it in terms of what One has already experienced so that it begins to modify what you know, modify who you are. So everything needs the pattern of differentiation to explore and integration to settle.

calculus

A: OK

M: Then the spiralling evolution occurs simply from the pattern of movement and return. Taking in and integrating it. Taking it in and digesting it. Everything to explore it is to gather what is unknown, gather what is yet to be experienced, that is to learn. Do you understand?

A: I do

M: So differentiation and integration in all things and indeed in set patterns and set polarities. Everything, then, is either active or receptive.

A: Back to yin and yang again, aren’t we.law_of_polarity

M: Of course!

A: Yes

M: So you notice I am not saying passive.

A: No

M: One is not passive. One is receptive. One has tapped into that which has been stirred up. So the evolution of all things requires an Explorer and an Integrator. That is someone discovers a new truth, somebody puts it in…

A: Integrates it

M: Of course

A: Right. So we do this on our own though in lots of little way. Like you said, I go out of my home, I find an experience, I bring it back, toss it about and integrate it. But, the way you’re talking, it sounds like you’re talking about two characters that are required for this.

M: Of course. You understand this is where a new life begins. So one important pattern is to descend and to choose whichever side of the balance One is attempting. Everybody in little ways but, in bigger and bigger ways, there is the nature of exploration and the nature of integration. And to explore without integrating is pointless and destructive. To integrate without exploration will not produce anything new at all.

A: Exactly. So for me, because I have chosen a feminine gender for this character, then am I favouring the side of integration for …

M: Of course.

A: … for society though? I’m thinking on a bigger term.

M: Of course. For stability so that One is not forced into destructive by going in every direction and not putting it into practice. Not bringing it in and bedding it down, putting it into service for the growth of the family. That is the nature called nurturing. So then, One looks to what is out beyond and One brings it back to the fold.

A: That’s the masculine that does that though, right?

M: Of course and then, in the fold, it is used and put into practice as such – or put into service is a better quality. So you understand without exploration there is no evolution.

A: Right.

Science exploration and evidence

M: The result of course is the prominence of the truly scientific mind. Science then is the pattern of differentiation. To separate out and to review alternative explanations and then it is important that the task of proof – that is gaining enough evidence – so that it can be integrated.

A: Right and I wonder if that’s what’s often missing. That science will come up with a new discovery with not enough evidence behind it. Then everybody rushes off to match that and then finds it doesn’t lead anywhere.

M: Of course the evidence is what is so important and One should always consider the evidence in line with the intuitive.

A: I was just going to say that. Sometimes you just cannot get all the facts and yet your intuition will give you a different conclusion than if you had just looked at the facts (at hand).

Language – new names for old ideas

M: You understand that over many generations, many explorations, they have only simply proven what was already intuitively understood. And in order to protect that idea then One delivers a new label for it rather than calling it what it used to be called. This is one of the importances of understanding that language – names and so on – are really simply representations of something else. So when you create a new word or a new phrase, One needs to consider whether it is truly needed and what the differentiation is between the new definition and those of the past.

A: And whether you can get that message across to people or whether they end up with a different meaning for the same word.

M: Of course because One has to realise that the repetition of experience does not occur simply at the same vibration. So it is both true and false at the same time, that it is the same thing. So we begin to explore the law of Paradox.

The Law of Paradox, Cycles and Polarity

A: Yes indeed.

law_of_magneticismM: So this is how it fits together. The cyclic laws, the paradoxical laws and the law of Polarity. And in many ways other laws that seem to exist fit into all of those. So One wants to apply the law of magnetism. Yet the Law of Magnetism requires the Law of Polarity because you cannot attract something that is not polarised in opposition…

A: Mm, there’s no charge.

M: Of course. So One has to develop the charge. That is to bring about the ultimate desire and that then is to identify the differentiation, the differences. You understand what I mean? There is so much to be learned because of the mathematics – and we have simply not touched upon the universal languages.

Two Universal Languages

universal_languageM: The two of them. One is the masculine arm and one is the feminine. The Universal languages of mathematics and music. 

A: Mm! Yes that will make a great conversation. This has brought something to my mind. I was sent a package a couple of years ago now which was automatic writing of the link between Quantum Physics and Mathematics. I have held onto these pages and not known what to do with them. Have you any suggestion for what would be a good way for me to get that out to the right people who would find the information useful?

M: Always a challenge, isn’t it? To recognise the connections between the intellectual and the intuitive. That is the connection between the fundamentals of logic and the fundamentals of harmony. You understand, music most often meets the logical framework at a metaphysical level. One could then talk a treatise about the mathematical formulas of a great Beethoven symphony. The mathematics are quite stunning…

A: I bet (laughs)

M: … as indeed are the colours that it produces. So there is such a benefit. However what an important and interesting consideration.

A: It is it is. I find there is so much in the research for the music I use in my work with the radio station at the moment, many of the descriptions are very logical, mathematical descriptions and yet I just want to talk about the emotion of it.

M: Of course because One cannot separate the masculine from the feminine.

A: You must have both.

Pending disaster

M: Of course! And not only must you have both but they must be in dynamic harmony and if you do not approach it in that way then there will be and is at the present time, a disaster pending. So we might entreat the balance between moving forward – that is keeping a stable and growing economy – in balance with a stable and growing ecology. So economy and ecology are both on the same balance. One will affect the other and One cannot simply want the greatest possible economy without truly damaging the ecology.

A: Yes. Is this the pending disaster you can see?

M: Of course. And One should remember this. That there is nothing worse than a thwarted woman.

A: This is Mother Earth?

M: Of course. Mother Earth is unhappy with the nature of how things have been progressed.

A: So is she able to express herself and correct the economy?

M: Of course but only in a very destructive way.

A: That’s what I expected.

M: In other words how will you first carry on? How will you first bring it to bear but by absorbing the economy. That is by requiring more and more of it to be used simply to stand still? Do you understand?

A: No

M: If you destroy the factory then, everything that you made, all of the profit that you made, has to be spent on rebuilding the very factory and so on. There is no profit in the longer term.

A: So are we moving too slowly as a species in getting our balance right?

M: Human Beings do not like to be held back. They do not want to take responsibility and I have pointed out in the changing age, in the new Epoch, we have already said there will be responsibility, accountability and transparency. And these qualities will become more and more brought to bare.

A: Right. So is there any way that we as a species can… appease Mother Earth? Can we, can we … (sigh) I just can’t see how we can get these politicians to change their viewpoint.

M: Of course but one should not blame the leaders one puts into …

A: (laughs) We voted them in.

M: Of course, even in such places where you do not think there is the voting as such, the leaders are still upheld, the leaders are still in their positions because of the support of many.

A: Yes. England is a very good example of that. Their poles seem to be so extreme in voting one way or the other. It seemed very fake to me.

M: Put it this way. Human Beings are still to learn the lessons of greed.

A: Yes

M: In the end there is no alternative because within the nature of balance, the Law of Polarity cannot be overturned because somebody wants it not to apply. It is just the same as jumping off your building and …

A: Saying the Law of Gravity doesn’t exist.

M: Of course. You have your King who sat on the shore and banished the waves. I mean what stupidity…

A (laughs)

M:… does Human Beings arise to?

A: That’s our entertainment, Mercredan! (laughs)

M: Of course it is the entertainment! and of course it has a little in the long term of importance. One simply thinks that a lifetime where One has everything is going to sustain One but of course in the end the balance has still to be reenacted.

So the old rich as such, who have not put their wealth into service for others, will indeed have to experience, or rather will choose to experience, what it is like on the other side.

A: Mm mm.

M: And even in their Authorship they are already indeed in the experience of it.

A: So the Author has already planned this out in the future? Is that what you mean?

M: I am saying that even in the novel there is still those that are suffering and the Author already has to have identified with it. You understand. The Author cannot avoid both sides of the battles.

A: Mm they must address both sides.

M: And One cannot progress into the new Epoch without One’s accounts being in balance. That is the point of responsibility. It is your responsibility to put your accounts into balance. It is until you take that responsibility there cannot be any progression into the new framework as such.

A: Mm ok.

M: Is that enough for today?

A: Yes, that felt quite a lot. Is there a good way for us to close this conversation?

M: One would have to ask whether you want it closed…

A: No! No just for today. I mean there’s plenty more to talk about.

M: …or would it be the beginnings for exploring more of these patterns?

A: Yes! I would love to know more about the patterns.

happinessM: Then thank you for your time and your attention and I want to suggest more presence, more being in the moment and being happy in the moment.

A: OK

M: Happiness is to be imposed rather than an expectation.

A: Hm!

M: That is enough for today. Then thank you and good morning.

A: Thank you Mercredan.

Opt In Image